Ttpdating trans admirer com Mobile chat young adults
We are dealing here with a seminar by Lacan which does not exist.
There is an advantage in presenting a seminar that does not exist: nobody would be able to tell me afterwards that I have not talked about this or that. Fundamentals of Psychoanalysis Why can we say that there is a Lacan’s seminar that does not exist?
As if—we could venture into the “as if” raised by this hole—to meddle with the Name-of-the-Father in psychoanalysis was still impossible, as if the Name-of-the-Father should remain under a veil, as if those who dare to interfere with the Name-of-the-Father were doomed to some act of vengeance, as if some kind of curse was attached to the Name-of-the-Father, the curse of the Pharaoh.
The name “The Names of the Father’,” the title, was announced by Lacan in 1963 for the academic year 1963-1964.
We know that Lacan delivered the first lesson of this seminar and then came to a halt: silence …
First he said yes, and next morning he called me and said that he had changed his mind: “No.” So, the opening lesson has not been published, at least by me, ever since. Thus, “The Names of the Father,” the seminar for that title, was a hole in Lacan’s teaching.
And, over the years, he clearly had a great pleasure in interpreting that hole.He used to say—and this is found in his seminars as well as in : “It is not by chance that I could not do my seminar on the Names of the Father.” He regarded the fact that he couldn’t deliver the seminar on The Names of the Father as belonging to the realm of the impossible: “It is not by chance,” there is a need at work, that perhaps renders it impossible.